Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net> writes: > > > I think you go through and remove the "$" signs (probably at the same > > > time you are removing "_") and use a runtime function to do the > > > translation (probably the same function doing the interpolation). > > > > I could not accept any solution that cannot offer anything but this. > > This kind of interpolation is plain broken. > > How so? I need more info to go on. In the applications that I have in mind, interpolated strings are typically presented to the user, so there must be a way to localize them. An extension to the language that does not support localization is useless if I have to find some other means for l10n. If there will be a standard library function that does the interpolation anyway, I'd prefer not to have a language extension ot achieve the same thing, but is more limited. If anything, the language extension should be more powerful, not more limited, in applicability. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4