Andrew Kuchling writes:
> But for applications where people don't edit Python, this could just
> be a library module and doesn't need a new operator in the Python
> code. I agree with Paul; there's no actual gain in clarity from the
> new syntax.
I'm happy with that as well.
> Presumably Paul is thinking of something like:
> mlist = load_list('listname')
> # Lists have .title, .password, ...
> form_value = cgi.form['text'] # User puts $password into text
> print text \ vars(mlist)
Yes, but I'm not convinced this has any more security implications
implications than using a library function to perform the
transformation.
-Fred
--
Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at acm.org>
PythonLabs at Zope Corporation
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4