barry wrote:
> From a /non-programmer's/ point of view, %(var)s is way too error
> prone, and $-strings are an attempt at implementing a simple to
> explain, hard to get wrong, rule for thru-the-web supplied template
> strings.
how about making that "s" optional?
1. %% substitutes to just a single %
2. %(identifier) followed by non-identifier characters gets
interpolated with the value of the 'identifier' key in the sub-
stitution dictionary.
3. For handling cases where the identifier is followed by
identifier characters that aren't part of the key, $(identfier)s
is equivalent to %(identifier)
</F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4