BAW> ... I suspect some new prefix would have to designate a new type of
BAW> string object, e.g. $'' strings. Or perhaps a different binary
BAW> operator could be used.
I'm still not at all fond of the $-string idea, but in the interests of
completeness, perhaps using '$' as a binary operator (by analogy with '%' as
a binary operator having nothing to do with modulo when the left arg is a
string) would be appropriate.
Skip
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4