Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-February/020027.html below:

syntactic sugar idea for {static,class}methods

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] syntactic sugar idea for {static,class}methods
• Next message: [Python-Dev] SyntaxError tracebacks in 2.2
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I would think that specifying a list (as in  [staticmethod]) would be very
desirable so that you could do a sequence of transformations, not just one.
Michael's examples seem to suggest elements of an Aspect-oriented approach
to things.  If you have several relevant "Aspect wrappers", then you might
want to apply each cascaded in sequence.  If, using previous examples, I
want a "static" method that is also "memoized" and "SOAPed" I could write:

        def mymethod(arg) [staticmethod,memoize,webmethod]:

or some such combination that is presumably well-defined.

Jim

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] syntactic sugar idea for {static,class}methods
• Next message: [Python-Dev] SyntaxError tracebacks in 2.2
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4