Guido van Rossum wrote: > > > Maybe we should turn the Optik documentation into a PEP (or at least > > make a PEP with a pointer to it) so that people with competitive > > solutions can either suggest improvements or claim that their solution > > is a better starting point. > > IMO we don't need a PEP, but we do need to solicit feedback from > people with competitive solutions. Can you post something to c.l.py > and c.l.py.announce? I am happy to do an announcement but I feel like there needs to be a place to redirect conversation. Should we set up a mailing list? Or do all interested people want to join comp.lang.python and perhaps use a subject prefix for filtering? "OPT: ..." Paul Prescod
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4