Ping> All right -- i have attempted to diagram a slightly more
Ping> interesting example, using my interpretation of Guido's scheme.
Very nice. One case I would like to see covered is that of a global that is
deleted. Something like:
import eggs
i = -2
max = 3
j = 4
def foo(n):
y = abs(i) + max
return eggs.ham(y + n)
del j
I presume there would still be an entry in spam's module dict with a NULL
objptr.
The whole think makes sense to me if it avoids the possible two
PyDict_GetItem calls in the LOAD_GLOBAL opcode. As I understand it, if
accessed inside a function, LOAD_GLOBAL could be implemented something like
this:
case LOAD_GLOBAL:
cell = func_cells[oparg];
if (cell.objptr) x = cell->objptr;
else x = cell->cellptr->objptr;
if (x == NULL) {
... error recovery ...
break;
}
Py_INCREF(x);
continue;
This looks a lot better to me (no complex function calls).
What happens in the module's top-level code where there is presumably no
func_cells array? Do we simply have two different opcodes, one for use at
the global level and one for use in functions?
Skip
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4