Tim> There's the problem of object identity: it's possible for exec'ed
Tim> code to mutate the original dict while the exec'ed code is running,
Tim> and Guido gave an example where that can matter.
In the face of exec statements or calls to execfile can't the compiler just
generate the usual LOAD_NAME fallback instead of the new-fangled LOAD_GLOBAL
opcode?
Skip
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4