Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-February/019866.html below:

add basic time type to the standard library

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] proposal: add basic time type to the standard library
• Next message: [Python-Dev] proposal: add basic time type to the standard library
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Guido van Rossum writes:
 > In that case, I take back everything I've said about Jim Fulton's
 > requirements.  I'm quite sure that in the past he said he needed a
 > very lightweight date/time object, but from what you say it appears
 > this need has disappeared.

He wanted this for the catalog, and I suspect he still does.  Both
size and performance (of comparisons) were important, not rendering
time.


  -Fred

-- 
Fred L. Drake, Jr.  <fdrake at acm.org>
PythonLabs at Zope Corporation

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] proposal: add basic time type to the standard library
• Next message: [Python-Dev] proposal: add basic time type to the standard library
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4