> > A better solution is to store additional information in the __dict__. > > You loose nice features: access these (new) slots from Python > by providing tp_members entries for them (for example). I'm not sure I understand what you mean. Why would you need a tp_members entry for something that's in __dict__? > Are you planning to address this issue in the future? David Abrahams (of Boost++ fame) is also interested in a solution for this problem, so I may have to. Not in 2.2.1, though -- this will have to be rearchitected so it's a 2.3 issue. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4