> A requirement could be added to the PEP 2 that would require a copyright > disclosure be included in the package/module so that the name "copyright" > would retrieve the relevant copyright for that package/module. A copyright > that did not require disclosure would return None. Though it makes the copyright accessible in a binary distribution, I don't think it fulfills the license requirements of being in printed in the documentation. So far, the simplest thing that gets the job done and minimizes the PITA factor is to have a section in the docs for licenses, paste them in a verbatim block, and make a link to them from the module docs. Raymond Hettinger ################################################################# ################################################################# ################################################################# ##### ##### ##### ################################################################# ################################################################# #################################################################
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4