On Sunday 29 December 2002 06:23 pm, Skip Montanaro wrote: > Jack> On the other thread: will including the copyright > Jack> notices/acknowledgements in the documentation be good enough if > we Jack> don't always ship the documentation? > > Is there any reason the copyright builtin can't be embellished to spit out > all the necessary copyrights? A requirement could be added to the PEP 2 that would require a copyright disclosure be included in the package/module so that the name "copyright" would retrieve the relevant copyright for that package/module. A copyright that did not require disclosure would return None. (BTW, PEP two is titled "Procedure for Adding New Modules". Should that be renamed "Procedure for Adding New Modules and Packages"?) >>> import mycoolpackage >>> mycoolpackage.copyright 'All rights to the use of mycoolpackage are hereby granted to the PSF. \n\n enjoy - authors of mycoolpackage\n' >>> The copyright builtin could be extended to add a search of all imported libraries to retrieve all of the copyrights that are used in an application.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4