Martin v. Löwis: > pcre-int.h says that the origin of PCRE must not be misrepresented by > omission [of Philip Hazel's copyright]. Discussion of this requirement for Scintilla (where I won't accept contributions with attribution requirements) led to this from Philip Hazel: % Yes. The licence says you must acknowledge PCRE in any software you % distribute that includes it. So Scintilla should acknowledge it. % However, the licence does not say that you have to impose this condition % on anybody who subsequently distrubutes other software that includes % your software. At least, that's one way I can read the licence. % % I'll put a sentence in if I can find some wording that says that % reasonably concisely. However, the current PCRE license still reads to me to require attribution no matter how deeply embedded it is. http://www.pcre.org/license.txt Neil
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4