Just van Rossum <just@letterror.com> writes:
> I find this rather ugly, and would only do that if it's crucial that the
> pathless importer should be invoked somewhere in the middle of sys.path.
> And I don't have a use case for that. There are plenty of use cases for
> sys.meta_path.
I've not really been following this discussion with utmost care, but
the name "meta_path" doesn't move me. Wouldn't sys.importers be
better name? Or maybe I'm misunderstanding it's intent -- which is
still an argument for a better name.
Cheers,
M.
--
Also, remember to put the galaxy back when you've finished, or an
angry mob of astronomers will come round and kneecap you with a
small telescope for littering.
-- Simon Tatham, ucam.chat, from Owen Dunn's review of the year
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4