> I think that Jeremy meant that this is only a useful occupation if you > expect to eventually reach a point where you expect that there aren't > any security flaws left. Jeremy & I both doubt that Python will ever > reach that level, meaning that the whole exercise of fixing security > flaws is a waste of time (if you know you *can't* make it safe, don't > waste time trying). Ok.. I'll take your suggestion. Thank you. -- Gustavo Niemeyer [ 2AAC 7928 0FBF 0299 5EB5 60E2 2253 B29A 6664 3A0C ]
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4