[Micheal McLay]
> > sf/653938I is a patch to integrate the fixedpoint module, that was
> > created by Tim Peters, into Python as a first class object. That is,
> > the patch adds this new number type so that it has direct syntax
> > support like float, int, long, str., etc. within the interpreter.
[Guido]
>
> (a) I don't want any (more) change to the syntax for Python 2.3.
>
> (b) Like the sets module, proposals for new datatypes should first be
> prototyped as standard library modules before being promoted to
> built-in status (with their own literals).
>
Speaking of which, if sets *were* to become built-ins, would the notation
{ member1, member2, member3, ... }
fly as a constructor literal? I don't know enough ab out the parser's
operations to determine how easy disambiguation from a dictionary
constructor might be, but it's certainly a desirably parallel notation with
mathematical sets.
all-a-long-way-from-2.3-ly y'rs - steve
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Steve Holden http://www.holdenweb.com/
Python Web Programming http://pydish.holdenweb.com/pwp/
Bring your musical instrument to PyCon! http://www.python.org/pycon/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4