Thomas Heller <theller@python.net> writes: > If I understand the PEP process correctly, the PEP is alive until > there is a definite pronouncement on it. That is certainly the case. > A 'locked buffer' object could be built if the PEP is implemented, > should it be part of the PEP? But if you expose the buffer address > to Python as an integer, you're living dangerous again. Why is that? Why does it add a danger that would not be there without it. It would be dangerous if you could create a buffer object by passing an arbitrary integer, but I'm not proposing such a thing. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4