> > Great! I strongly prefer contributions under the standard PSF > > license, so redistributors won't have to worry about separate > > licensing conditions of individual components. > > > > There's a draft contribution agreement at the PSF website: > > > > http://www.python.org/psf/psf-contributor-agreement.html > > Ok. If I understand all this correctly, the section entitled "Python > Contribution Licensing Agreement Version 1.0" is the appropriate one > for this particular case. If this is right, the PSF will soon get a > letter from me. Any hints on how to describe the contribution > accurately? Yup, that's the one. I'd say "the tarfile.py module and its documentation and unit tests" would cover your contribution adequately. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4