> Great! I strongly prefer contributions under the standard PSF > license, so redistributors won't have to worry about separate > licensing conditions of individual components. > > There's a draft contribution agreement at the PSF website: > > http://www.python.org/psf/psf-contributor-agreement.html Ok. If I understand all this correctly, the section entitled "Python Contribution Licensing Agreement Version 1.0" is the appropriate one for this particular case. If this is right, the PSF will soon get a letter from me. Any hints on how to describe the contribution accurately? -- Lars Gustäbel lars@gustaebel.de
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4