> Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org> writes: > > > > I intend to work on the PEP 298 (locked buffer interface) > > > implementation, with the hope that it is not too late to bring this > > > into 2.3. Is there still a chance? > > > > > > If it will not make it into 2.3, I will retract the PEP, > > > because 2.4 is too late for me. > > > > Is the PEP accepted? > > How could I know? Marked as Draft, I would say it is ready for > pronouncement. Only the implementation is missing. There are doubts about its usefulness. (AKA YAGNI.) Would you also provide implementations for common object types? Otherwise there wouldn't be a point, right? --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4