On Sat, Dec 07, 2002, Martin v. Löwis wrote: > Aahz <aahz@pythoncraft.com> writes: >> >> I'm seeing some convergence on basic criteria needed for a Grand Import >> Redesign, but I'm not seeing convergence on the actual design itself. >> Time is running short for 2.3, and people making hasty decisions make >> poor decisions. > > I disagree with this analysis. Time is not running short for Python > 2.3: there isn't even a release schedule, yet, and I question promises > that an alpha release will be produced this year. You may be right; however, the tone of the discussion seems to be partly predicated on a short timeframe. I'm fairly confident Guido won't hold 2.3 for lack of a new import facility. -- Aahz (aahz@pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ "To me vi is Zen. To use vi is to practice zen. Every command is a koan. Profound to the user, unintelligible to the uninitiated. You discover truth everytime you use it." --reddy@lion.austin.ibm.com
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4