> > It seems the majority doesn't like non-strings on sys.path, which to > > me is understandable, especially if you take PYTHONPATH into > > consideration. Let's try to focus on that. > > Has anyone presented any hard data, or are people just guessing? As far > as I can tell, I'm the only one here who has posted fragile code from a real > shipping product -- and I still believe it's a bogus argument. What Just said is that "majority doesn't like", not that there is breaking code. You can destroy the interpreter without breaking old code. I, personaly, *don't like* that, since it looks like an ugly hack to me. You may not care about this, and I don't expect to change the world with my feelings. Indeed, I've even tried to expose a different approach, as a way to avoid saying just "I don't like", but it looks like you don't care anyway, right? My intention was not to just create another flamewar in python-dev, I can guarant you. -- Gustavo Niemeyer [ 2AAC 7928 0FBF 0299 5EB5 60E2 2253 B29A 6664 3A0C ]
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4