> > Does anyone object if I just leave it as-is unless it is a major error > > that changes the meaning of the summary? Ideally, it would be best to fix *anything* that is incorrect. <snip> > > So, keep the errors in the archive or change them? As a recorder of history, accuracy takes precedence. In the archive, keep the original, add a bracketed section entitled Subsequent Corrections or some such, and make it right. In the next summary, add an errata section, and post the correction. Errata and amendments are like bugfixes, everyone admires the effort and knows they are better off with honest attempts at accuracy than they are with someone asserting that they always had it right to begin with. It's just good journalism Thanks again for your efforts to keep the community informed. Raymond
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4