[Gustavo Niemeyer] > > ================================ > > `Dictionary evaluation order`__ > > ================================ > > __ http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-November/030458.html > > > [...] > > Finn Bock said that Jython went f1, f2, f3, f4. In that case Guido didn't > > see any reason to fix it. But Tim Peters brought up the point that the > [...] > > I belive the correct sentence here would be: > > "In that case Guido didn't see any reason to *block* the fix." > Oops. =) So this brings up something I have been pondering; what to do when a mistake in a summary is found after it is already out the door. I can obviously fix the web version, but is it really worth it since I think most people read the text version that goes to comp.lang.python(.announce)? . Does anyone object if I just leave it as-is unless it is a major error that changes the meaning of the summary? This obviously makes it seems like Guido said something he didn't, but the outcome in the end is the same; the change was made. And I don't want to have to go back and make changes to summaries that are 6 months old or something when the issue has long past. So, keep the errors in the archive or change them? -Brett
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4