> it's confusing (and imcompatible wrt to how Java/Jython do things now). Sorry. I wouldn't like to do something in a different way than Jython does, or to obligate you to rework that. OTOH, I belive that this is a better scheme, and my obligation is to discuss that with you. If it's of common sense that this isn't good, it won't be accepted, and that's all. > __init__.py exists so that a package has a first-class counterpart, > namely a first class-module. That's a very similar idea. But if you don't like __init__.zip, just rename it to __module__.zip, or whatever. > Zipfiles should be able to embrace more than just one package and > should be transparent. Can you please explain how the propose changes that? -- Gustavo Niemeyer [ 2AAC 7928 0FBF 0299 5EB5 60E2 2253 B29A 6664 3A0C ]
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4