Paul Moore wrote: > > > Guido van Rossum wrote: > > >=20 > > > > Why don't you care about the backwards incompatibilities? > > >=20 > > > Because it's addressed by using a str subclass. > >=20 > > Which strikes *me* as an ugly hack. :-( >=20 > And it's dangerous. Code which assumes strings on sys.path and > modifies sys.path will fail silently rather than giving an error. ignoring for a moment that your example do work as expected with the proposed patch, since when is an "ImportError" a silent failure? next example, please. </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4