[Guido van Rossum] > > Do you prefer I do a separate ``dummy_threading`` module or follow > > Martin's suggestions and just turn ``dummy_thread`` into a ``threading`` > > substitute itself? > > Two separate modules. They have different APIs and it wouldn't be > wise to export a different API in the dummy case than in the real > case. (I'm sure you can figure out why.) > I would hope I could. =) OK, so as I said in the response to Tim's email, anyone who was actually going to look at the patch can hold off until I email the list again when I have ``dummy_threading`` done. And if someone can delete the old files from the patch I would appreciate it (almost all of them will have to be regenerated anyway). -Brett
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4