Samuele Pedroni wrote: > I would it support this kind of code: > > sys.path = L > L.append(...) ? Sure -- sys.path wouldn't be a "real" list object, just one that behaved as one. Just: > How is this different (besides being more complex <wink>) from making > import hooks string subclasses? It doesn't require the import hook to be a string subclass, which you said was hard to do if the import hook is to be written in C. If making it easy to write a C import hook isn't a requirement anymore, let me know! --david
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4