On Tuesday, Dec 3, 2002, at 19:05 Europe/Amsterdam, Martin v. L=F6wis=20 wrote: > At the time the universal newline code was committed, there was > discussion whether or not it should be optional. > > I'd like to propose that it doesn't need to be optional: having a > configuration option for it complicates the build documentation, and > the space savings that one may gain from disabling it are minimal. > > So I volunteer to remove the #ifdef machinery around it. Any > objections? Well, we don't know yet whether it will work on non-mainstream=20 platforms. It'll probably be okay on BeOS or Amiga or such (and maybe the=20 maintainers of those platforms track CVS anyway?), but I wouldn't vouch for Windows=20= CE or so. -- - Jack Jansen <Jack.Jansen@oratrix.com> =20 http://www.cwi.nl/~jack - - If I can't dance I don't want to be part of your revolution -- Emma=20 Goldman -
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4