[MvL] > > If more people speak in favour of rejecting the zipfile import patch, we > > should probably tell Paul Moore, so that won't invest more time into > > what is a doomed project. [Guido] > > I agree with both sides here. :-( / :-) > > The zipfile feature is important, and if this patch is the only way to > get the feature in, so be it. > > But import.c really can use a cleanup. > > I wouldn't be against incorporating some version of the patch now, and > cleaning it up later, possibly adding a new import hooking framework > and moving some of the zip specific code out of import.c again. > Agreed. Like MAL I feel this is an important patch to get in to the distribution, even if it leaves a refactoring job behind it. Safe for me to say when I no longer do C, I suppose :-) but I'm speaking from a user perspective here. regards ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Steve Holden http://www.holdenweb.com/ Python Web Programming http://pydish.holdenweb.com/pwp/ Previous .sig file retired to www.homeforoldsigs.com -----------------------------------------------------------------------
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4