A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-August/028353.html below:

[Python-Dev] Move sets and `cogen' into a math module

[Python-Dev] Move sets and `cogen' into a math module [Python-Dev] Move sets and `cogen' into a math moduleMichael McLay mclay@nist.gov
Mon, 26 Aug 2002 19:19:13 -0400
On Monday 26 August 2002 05:56 pm, Fran=E7ois Pinard wrote:

> The module could be called `cogen', abbreviation for COmbinatorial
> GENerators.  Here is a first throw, to be criticised and improved.

With sets and possibly cogen being added to the standard library is it li=
kely=20
that additional interesting math capabilities will creep into the standar=
d=20
Python libraries? Reducing the clutter of the top level namespace is hard=
 to=20
do if code depends on it, so better to do it right from the start. Do the=
se=20
modules belong at the top level?  Would it make sense to change the math=20
module into a package and move the new module inside that the math packag=
e?





RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4