[Guido van Rossum]
> > May I invite you to reconsider? We are going to live with that one for
> > a loong time, you know...
> I know. I have read and re-read your arguments, but I see nothing to
> change my mind. Somehow the short names you suggest just seem wrong
> to me. We can agree to disagree, but I feel strongly that the names
> should not be changed.
As you did read my arguments (from your first reply, I thought you missed
them, and this is why I tried explaining them better), and that I have
nothing substantially new to offer, that closes this discussion... We are
solidly set on the current documentation. To be or not to be, ... etc. :-)
Have a good day, and keep happy!
--
François Pinard http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~pinard
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4