> > I remember you said you didn't want to do base64 decode because it was > > too slow? > > And not necessary. Base64 spam invariably has telltales that Bayesian > amalysis will pick up in the headers and MIME cruft. A rather large > percentage of it is either big5 or images. I'd be curious to know if that will continue to be true in the future. At least one of my non-tech friends sends email that's exclusively HTML (even though the content is very lightly marked-up plain text), from a hotmail account. Spam could easily have the same origin, but the HTML contents would be very different. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4