> Hmm ... is there a case that NotImplementedError should be a > subclass of TypeError? Conceptually it would make sense (this *type* > does not implement this method). I think you're overthinking this. NotImplementedError is fine for code that wants to send that particular message to the user. We're playing with TypeError here because we're trying to be close to the metal. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4