Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org> writes: > I am still perplexed that I receoved *no* feedback on the sets module > except on this issue of sort order (which I consider solved by adding > a method _repr() that takes an optional 'sorted' argument). This is hardly without precedent, though, is it? (I mean the only getting feedback on trivia). I haven't looked at the set implementationin detail, but given that it's principal authors are you and Alex, I'm sure it must be wonderful. Is that better? :) Cheers, M. -- Or here's an even simpler indicator of how much C++ sucks: Print out the C++ Public Review Document. Have someone hold it about three feet above your head and then drop it. Thus you will be enlightened. -- Thant Tessman
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4