Jeremy Hylton <jeremy@alum.mit.edu>: > I lobbied in favor of PEP 269 earlier, because it is mostly exposing > functionality that already exists but is difficult to reuse. That > seems like a good thing even if some people want to use other parser > generators. There's a downside that you'd then be committed to supporting it, even if Python stopped using pgen itself some time in the future. If that's not a worry, then fine -- just pointing out that exposing previously unexposed functionality isn't necessarily without cost. Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+ University of Canterbury, | A citizen of NewZealandCorp, a | Christchurch, New Zealand | wholly-owned subsidiary of USA Inc. | greg@cosc.canterbury.ac.nz +--------------------------------------+
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4