Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-August/028060.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 269 versus 283.

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 269 versus 283.
• Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 269 versus 283.
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I lobbied in favor of PEP 269 earlier, because it is mostly exposing
functionality that already exists but is difficult to reuse.  That
seems like a good thing even if some people want to use other parser
generators.

I've only seen pgen used for one application, and that one application
has been modestly successfuly.  So a language can do worse than
starting with pgen.

Jeremy

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 269 versus 283.
• Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 269 versus 283.
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4