Andrew Koenig <ark@research.att.com> writes: > Guido> I'm guessing that gcc 3.2 somehow also installs binutils 2.13 and that > Guido> the bug is in the latter. > > I see no evidence that gcc 3.2 installs binutils 2.13. > In particular, if I install gcc 3.2, *then* install > binutils 2.12.1, it still fails. You can't do that (if installing 2.12.1 means to downgrade from 2.13). gcc configuration analyses features of binutils at configure time, and relies on those features to be present at run-time. Are you sure that gcc picks up the binutils you had installed when you configured gcc? In particular, what happens if you do gcc --print-prog-name=as gcc --print-prog-name=ld Are those the once that you had in PATH when configuring? Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4