> Extracting a category from an existing class:
> foobarlike = like(FooBar)
>
> The members of the foobarlike category are any classes that
> implement the same methods and attributes as FooBar, whether or not
> they are actually descended from it. They may be defined
> independently in another library.
This seems fairly userless in practice -- you almost never want to use
*all* methods and attributes of a class as the characteristic. (Even
if you skip names starting with _.)
> FooBar may be an abstract class used just as a template for a category.
Then the like() syntax seems unnecessary. It then becomes similar to
Zope's Interfaces.
> Asserting that a class must be a member of a category:
>
> class SomeClass:
> __category__ = like(AnotherClass)
> ...
In Zope:
class SomeClass:
__implements__ = AnotherClass
By convention, AnotherClass usually has a name that indicates it
is an interface: IAnotherClass.
> At the end of the class definition it will be checked whether it
> really is a member of that category (like(SomeClass) issubsetof
> like(AnotherClass)) This attribute is inherited by subclasses. Any
> subclass of this class will be checked whether it is still a member
> of the category.
I've been mulling over another way to spell this; perhaps you can
add categories to the inheritance list:
class SomeClass(IAnotherClass):
...
There's ambiguity here though: extending an interface already uses the
same syntax:
class IExtendedClass(IAnotherClass):
...
Disambiguating based on name conventions seems wrong and unpythonic.
In C++, abstract classes are those that have one or more abstract
methods; maybe we can borrow from that.
> A subclass
> may also override this attribute:
>
> class InheritImplementationButNotTheCategoryCheckFrom(SomeClass):
> __category__ = some_other_category
> ...
My alternative spelling idea currently has no way to do this; but one
is needed, and preferably one that's not too ugly.
> class AddAdditionalRestrictionsTo(SomeClass):
> __category__ = __category__ & like(YetAnotherClass)
There's a (shallow) problem here, in that __category__ is not
initially in your class's namespace: at the start of executing the
class statement, you begin with an empty local namespace.
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4