>> ... how about renaming PyString_InternInPlace to >> PyString_InternImmortal? Guido> Better still, I think we could safely make all interned strings Guido> mortal -- I don't see any use for immortal strings. Wasn't this part of the original discussion? Extension modules are free to call PyString_InternInPlace and may well expect immortal strings, so for backward compatibility, the functionality probably has to remain for a time, yes? Of course, I'm speaking with my fake expert hat on. I've never even considered interning a string, immortal, immoral, or otherwise. Skip
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4