> I hope Oren resumes his crusade to make interned strings follow the > same refcount rules as everything else, and then we wouldn't have > this fear of interning. BTW, nobody yet has reported any code where > "indirect interning" pays -- or even triggers once in a > non-eating-its-own-tail way. Maybe we should just drop indirect interning then. It can save 31 bits per string object, right? How to collect those savings? --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4