On Mon, 5 Aug 2002, Guido van Rossum wrote: > At least this still holds (unless x is an iterator or otherwise > mutated by access :-): > > for v in x: > assert v in x And -- wham! -- the dangers of an invisibly destructive "in" operator land in front of us once again like an enormous stomping foot falling out of the sky. Still not convinced? Oh, well. There exists a solution, in case you're curious: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-July/026899.html -- ?!ng
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4