Tim:
> [Greg Ewing]
> > I thought you'd always argued against this before, on
> > the grounds that the convenience wasn't worth the
> > inconsistency. Are you starting to change your mind?
>
> This one's a done deal; it was released in 2.2:
>
> >>> 2 in {2: 3}
> 1
I'm talking about making "for x in string" do a substring
test. This is different from "for x in dict", because at
least the latter is still a kind of membership test.
I thought Guido was against having "in" do anything
other than membership tests, but his last message sounded
like he was changing his mind.
Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+
University of Canterbury, | A citizen of NewZealandCorp, a |
Christchurch, New Zealand | wholly-owned subsidiary of USA Inc. |
greg@cosc.canterbury.ac.nz +--------------------------------------+
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4