Guido van Rossum wrote: > > > In testing this patch, I ran across this: > > > > >>> 's' in 's' is True > > False > > > > What's up with that? Am I missing something? > > Yes, 'is' and'in' and '==' are all comparison operators, and the > chaining syntax makes this interpreted as (roughly) Thanks (to Jeff too). I knew I had to be missing something. Well there's a still the patch with a working test. Neal
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4