> From: Tim Peters [mailto:tim.one@comcast.net]=20 >=20 > [Guido] > > ... > > I don't like exists(). Maybe we should finally implement=20 > "s1 in s2"=20 > > as "s2.find(s1) >=3D 0", i.e. add a __contains__ method to strings? >=20 > I asked you about that a few weeks ago, and you were=20 > agreeable. I posted that info to c.l.py, saying that if=20 > anyone cared enough to submit a patch, the idea was=20 > pre-approved. AFAIK, nobody bit (but I didn't pay much=20 > attention to patches last week -- hope springs eternal <wink>). Well, there was http://groups.google.com/groups?q=3DBjorn+PyUnicode+group:comp.lang.pytho= n &hl=3Den&lr=3D&ie=3DUTF-8&oe=3DUTF-8&selm=3Dmailman.1024100114.13008.pyth= on-list%4 0python.org&rnum=3D1. I'll see if I can find time next weekend to figure out the compilation warnings, adding back special casing for single char containment, and adding test and doc patches... -- bjorn
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4