Ka-Ping Yee <python-dev@zesty.ca>: > To me, using "1.", "(1)", or "1)" to number a list makes no semantic > difference at all, and so it counts as redundancy. I imagine the variations are there so that RST documents can be easily read in their own right. Having different styles of headings, list numbers, etc. for different levels aids readability. Each of these features is no doubt useful for one appplication or another, but we're talking about a fairly restricted application here. Docstrings are usually pretty short and not likely to require multiple levels of headings, lists, etc. So I'm in favour of choosing a subset to recommend, perhaps mandate. Maybe a slightly larger subset could be used for PEPs, since they're somewhat bigger. Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+ University of Canterbury, | A citizen of NewZealandCorp, a | Christchurch, New Zealand | wholly-owned subsidiary of USA Inc. | greg@cosc.canterbury.ac.nz +--------------------------------------+
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4