Andrew Koenig <ark@research.att.com> writes:
> It seems to me that there are four reasonable courses of action:
>
> 1) Do nothing -- the problem is too trivial to worry about.
>
> 2) Change string split (and its documentation) to match regexp split.
>
> 3) Change regexp split (and its documentation) to match string split.
>
> 4) Change both string split and regexp split to do something else :-)
There is another option:
5) Change the documentation of re.split to match the implemented
behaviour.
Not that I could say what the implemented behaviour is, though :-(
Regards,
Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4