[Tim] > The conclusion doesn't change, though: that's still in the range of > block pymalloc handles (and will remain so unless I reduce > pymalloc's small-object threshold below what's needed for pymalloc > to handle small dicts on its own -- which I'm unlikely to do). Would it make sense to change the Unicode object to use pymalloc, and to change the UTF-8 codec to count the bytes if the shortest possible output would fit in a pymalloc block? (I guess this means that the length of the Unicode string should be less than SMALL_REQUEST_THRESHOLD - currently 256.) --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4