> Patrick> ... what about something like: > > >>> None.__class__.__base__ > <type 'object'> > > Patrick> Or does this not apply because None is at the front? > > I suspect it does apply. > > I doubt it's used much, but what would happen to types.NoneType? If > None is a keyword, how will you generate it, or will it disappear > when that happens? Nothing would change. None would be a literal keyword, but its value in an expression would be the same as before, so None.__class__ would work. Compare "foo".__class__. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4