>> dotted_name: NAME ('.' NAME)*
[Patrick K. O'Brien]
> I know nothing about the compiler code, but what about something like:
>
> >>> None.__class__.__base__
> <type 'object'>
> >>>
>
> Or does this not apply because None is at the front?
Yup, good point, 'None' does make sense as the first NAME in the dotted_name
production.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4